Banner artwork by Biscotto Design / Shutterstock.com
ACC has a wonderful Career Development Section that includes many useful articles on each stage of an in-house attorney’s career. In one of the articles, retired general counsel Rich Cohen addresses a number of questions that should be considered throughout anyone’s career, not only in-house counsel and not only at halftime. This is how he opens the article:
“Time has a tendency to slip by and then you wonder: Where has the time gone and what have you accomplished professionally? What do you want to do the rest of your career and are you a satisfied and fulfilled professional?
These are common questions as you enter into the midpoint of your career. Like an American football game’s halftime, in-house counsel need to make the necessary adjustments to make sure they’re successful by the end of their careers. But all too often, our definition of “winning” changes between the first and second halves of your career.
It’s important for in-house counsel to take the time and examine their current career paths and where they want to grow in the future: Is success about prestige and finding fortune? Or is it more about balance between personal and professional lives?
At this stage of your in-house career, you must be willing to assess yourself and your talents in an honest fashion in order to make careful, knowledgeable, and hopefully, positive changes. You control the outcome through careful introspection, planning, and discipline — you can change your career path.”
A new alternative is available for those considering their next step: teaching law in a business school. Traditionally, business schools offered two business law teaching options: (1) full-time positions that include full teaching, research, and service responsibilities and (2) part-time positions that include only teaching duties. But increasingly, they are offering a third option, a full-time position that focuses on teaching. For example, 11 of the 28 full-time business law positions at Indiana University are held by teaching faculty.
In a recent article in the American Bar Association Journal, I discuss how law in a business school differs from law school teaching, with examples from courses taught by Wharton’s Professor Richard Shell. These differences illustrate why attorneys with in-house experience are ideal candidates for a business law position. For instance:
- Business law professors, like many in-house lawyers, tend to be generalists when teaching required courses. A required course at Indiana University, for example, covers torts, contracts, and government regulation. But there is also an opportunity to teach electives in specialized areas of the law.
- Business law teaching is less theoretical and more applied than law school teaching. As a result, full-time teaching positions might require the type of experience that in-house counsel possess.
- Business law professors interact with colleagues from a variety of disciplines that are similar to the business functions that in-house counsel work with.
- Just as in-house counsel have the opportunity to cross over to leadership positions beyond the law function, many business law professors serve in leadership positions on campus.
If you are interested in a business law position, a starting point is membership in the Academy of Legal Studies in Business, which maintains a list of job postings. A side benefit is the ability to obtain CLE credit at the annual ALSB meeting. Additional benefits are described in the ABAJ article.
Disclaimer: The information in any resource in this website should not be construed as legal advice or as a legal opinion on specific facts, and should not be considered representing the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical guidance and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.
