Canada’s Federal Election: Implications for Cross-Border Legal and Trade Strategies

Banner artwork by Sergii Figurnyi / Shutterstock.com

In a closely watched federal election, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party secured a minority government, signaling both continuity and transformation in the country’s political and economic trajectory.

While falling short of a majority, the new government appears poised to advance a more business-friendly agenda than in previous years, including the reversal of a proposed capital gains tax hike and plans to liberalize internal trade. At the same time, this transition takes place in a complex landscape marked by heightened trade tensions with the United States, increased deficit spending, and slowing economic growth.

For in-house counsel and the businesses they serve, these developments present a mix of opportunity and uncertainty across regulatory, tax, trade, and project-development domains. The following key takeaways outline possibilities for legal teams to consider as they navigate the implications of Canada’s evolving policy environment.

Liberal minority government ushers in pro-business shift with fiscal trade-offs

• Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberals have retained power with a minority government (167 of 343 seats, short of the 172 required for a majority), maintaining political continuity while pivoting toward more business-friendly policies.
• Carney’s background in central banking and global finance has reassured markets. He has canceled a proposed capital gains tax increase, signaling a pro-investment stance favorable to corporate entities.

Fiscal expansion ahead, with regulatory and trade complexity

• The Liberal platform includes additional deficit spending of around 2.5 percent of GDP over four years, compared to 0.3 percent proposed by the Conservatives.
• This has implications for tax policy, infrastructure contracts, and public-private partnerships, and could increase federal regulatory activity — especially in sectors dependent on public funds or oversight.

Cross-border trade risks elevated amid US tariff uncertainty

• With about 75 percent of Canadian exports going to the US, and many industries (steel, autos, oil) affected by Trump-era tariffs, legal counsel may anticipate intensified trade enforcement and are likely to focus increasingly on tariff mitigation strategies.
• Carney’s stance marks a departure from US-led trade integration, suggesting new domestic trade liberalization and diversification of export markets.

Energy and infrastructure acceleration offers legal opportunity

• Both major parties have committed to fast-tracking energy projects, especially those reducing US dependency — creating potential demand for legal support in project finance, environmental law, and indigenous consultations.

Minority government means policy fluidity and potential legal uncertainty

• With no majority in Parliament, the Liberals will need support from smaller parties to pass key legislation, increasing the likelihood of policy concessions or delays, particularly in areas like corporate taxation, financial regulation, and ESG mandates.
• Minority governments in Canada historically last no more than 2.5 years, so businesses should prepare for evolving legal landscapes, such as in connection with potential early elections.

Investor sentiment remains mixed

• Investors may react cautiously to increased debt issuance. A more aggressive fiscal approach could affect monetary policy, bond markets, and corporate borrowing costs, with downstream impacts on transaction structuring, debt covenants, and regulatory reporting.

This article was produced with the assistance of GenAI.